MillRight CNC Mega V 2 XL (35x35) vs Onefinity Gen 2 Elite Woodworker

Two desktop CNC routers side by side, from each maker's own page, read 1 November 2026. Neither has been tested for this site, so this shows what each maker publishes, not which cuts better.

MillRight CNC Mega V 2 XL (35x35), photo from MillRight CNCPhoto: MillRight CNC

MillRight CNC Mega V 2 XL (35x35)
$2,999.00

Onefinity Gen 2 Elite Woodworker
$2,195.00

Where they differ

Published specs

MillRight CNC Mega V 2 XL (35x35) vs Onefinity Gen 2 Elite Woodworker: published specifications
MillRight CNC Mega V 2 XL (35x35)Onefinity Gen 2 Elite Woodworker
Price$2,999.00$2,195.00
Work area889 × 889 mm838 × 838 mm
Z133 mm (5.2")178 mm (7.0")
Spindle or routerNot included; Makita or DeWalt router mounts and 1.5 kW / 2.2 kW spindles are paid optionsNot included; takes an 80 mm or 65 mm spindle or a Makita trim router
DriveSteel rack and pinion on X and Y; screw drive on ZBallscrew (1616 on X/Y, 1610 on Z)
Linear guidesLinear profile rails on every axis60 mm steel tube X, 50 mm Y; 20 mm guide rails Z
Controller and motorsGRBL by default (Masso G3 Touch +$2,200). Closed-loop motors.Redline CNC controller. Closed-loop 2 Nm X/Y, 1.2 Nm Z. Computer optional (15" screen option); WiFi, Ethernet.
SoftwareCAD/CAM not included; MillRight's UGS for GRBLLists Vectric, Carveco, Fusion 360, Easel, Carbide Create compatibility; no subscription
Footprint42" x 49.5" plus an 8" control box beside itNot published
WeightNot publishedNot published
WarrantyNot publishedNot published
Spec notes1None found
SourceMaker’s page ↗Maker’s page ↗

Work areas to scale

Gen 2 Elite Woodworker838 × 838 mmMega V 2 XL (35x35)889 × 889 mmLetter sheet216 × 279 mm
Both published X × Y work areas at the same scale, with a US Letter sheet. Original drawing.

Open in the compare tool See them on your bench

Why this pair

Pairs are picked by a rule: machines in the same size class and within about 60% of each other's price, plus each machine's nearest sibling from the same maker. No search or keyword data was used. All 46 pairs.

Related comparisons